Method and apparatus for selecting modulation and coding scheme (mcs) index based on frequency selectivity

ABSTRACT

A method of selecting a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) index in a wireless communication system is disclosed. More specifically, the method includes measuring a frequency selectivity of a receiving channel, selecting a MCS index having a coding rate below a prescribed coding rate threshold value if the measured frequency selectivity is greater than or equal to a specified frequency selectivity threshold, and selecting the MCS index having the coding rate above or equal to the prescribed coding rate threshold value if the measured frequency selectivity is less than the specified frequency selectivity threshold.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to method for selecting modulation andcoding scheme (MCS) index, and more particularly, to method andapparatus for selecting MCS index based on frequency selectivity.

BACKGROUND ART

A next generation mobile wireless communication system generallyprovides a high speed multimedia service. With the use of multimediaservice becoming more widespread, wireless communication users' demandand need for faster, more reliable, and better multimedia is growing.

To accommodate such a growing demand, research to provide more efficientand improved service is taking place. In other words, various methods ofimproving data transmission are being researched, and in particular,ways to improve use of frequency resources are being explored.

With fast growing use and popularity of multimedia and communicationservices, demand for faster and more reliable wireless communicationservices is also increasing at a fast rate. In order to accommodate suchchanging demands, the capacity of the wireless communication systemneeds to improve as well. To this end, the capacity can be improved bybetter utilizing and increasing the efficiency of the existing limitedwireless resources.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention is directed to method and apparatusfor selecting MCS index based on frequency selectivity thatsubstantially obviates one or more problems due to limitations anddisadvantages of the related art.

An object of the present invention is to provide a method of selecting amodulation and coding scheme (MCS) index in a wireless communicationsystem.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a method ofselecting a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) index from apredetermined MCS set, having same frequency efficiency, in a wirelesscommunication system.

A further object of the present invention is to provide a method ofselecting a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) index in a wirelesscommunication system having a first MCS table associated with codingrate that is less than a specified coding rate threshold and a secondMCS table associated with coding rate that is greater than or equal tothe specified coding rate threshold.

Yet, in another object of the present invention is to provide anapparatus for selecting a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) index in awireless communication system.

Additional advantages, objects, and features of the invention will beset forth in part in the description which follows and in part willbecome apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art uponexamination of the following or may be learned from practice of theinvention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention may berealized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in thewritten description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.

To achieve these objects and other advantages and in accordance with thepurpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, amethod of selecting a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) index in awireless communication system includes measuring a frequency selectivityof a receiving channel, selecting a MCS index having a coding rate belowa prescribed coding rate threshold value if the measured frequencyselectivity is greater than or equal to a specified frequencyselectivity threshold, and selecting the MCS index having the codingrate above or equal to the prescribed coding rate threshold value if themeasured frequency selectivity is less than the specified frequencyselectivity threshold.

In another aspect of the present invention, a method of selecting amodulation and coding scheme (MCS) index from a predetermined MCS set,having same frequency efficiency, in a wireless communication systemincludes measuring a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of a receiving signal,measuring a frequency selectivity of a receiving channel if a first MCSindex is of the MCS set, wherein the first MCS index is determined bycomparing the measured SNR against a prescribed SNR threshold, selectinga second MCS index having a coding rate below a predetermined codingrate threshold if the measured frequency selectivity is greater than orequal to a specified frequency selectivity threshold, and selecting thesecond MCS index having the coding rate greater than or equal to thepredetermined coding rate threshold if the selected frequencyselectivity is less than the specified frequency selectivity threshold,wherein the second MCS index is of the MCS set.

In a further aspect of the present invention, a method of selecting amodulation and coding scheme (MCS) index in a wireless communicationsystem having a first MCS table associated with coding rate that is lessthan a specified coding rate threshold and a second MCS table associatedwith coding rate that is greater than or equal to the specified codingrate threshold includes measuring a frequency selectivity of a receivingchannel, selecting a MCS index from the first MCS table if the measuredfrequency selectivity is greater than or equal to a specified frequencyselectivity threshold, and selecting the MCS index from the second MCStable if the measured frequency selectivity is less than the specifiedfrequency selectivity threshold.

Yet, in another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus forselecting a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) index in a wirelesscommunication system includes a frequency selectivity measurement moduleconfigured to measure a frequency selectivity of a receiving channel,and a MCS index selection module configured to: select a MCS indexhaving a coding rate below a prescribed coding rate threshold value ifthe measured frequency selectivity is greater than or equal to aspecified frequency selectivity threshold, and select the MCS indexhaving the coding rate above or equal to the prescribed coding ratethreshold value if the measured frequency selectivity is less than thespecified frequency selectivity threshold.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description andthe following detailed description of the present invention areexemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide furtherexplanation of the invention as claimed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a furtherunderstanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute apart of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention andtogether with the description serve to explain the principle of theinvention. In the drawings;

FIG. 1 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a structure of an orthogonalfrequency division multiplexing (OFDM) communication system to which anadaptive modulation and coding (AMC) scheme is applied;

FIG. 2 is an exemplary diagram illustrating application of the AMCscheme in the OFDM system;

FIG. 3 is an exemplary graph illustrating performance comparisonsaccording to modulation and coding scheme (MCS) in a channel environmenthaving different frequency selectivity;

FIG. 4 is another exemplary graph illustrating performance comparisonsaccording to modulation and coding scheme (MCS) in a channel environmenthaving different frequency selectivity;

FIG. 5 is an exemplary diagram illustrating selection of coding rateaccording to frequency selectivity;

FIG. 6 is an exemplary diagram illustrating processes associated withMCS index selection; and

FIG. 7 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a structure of an apparatusfor selecting MCS index.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of thepresent invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanyingdrawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be usedthroughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.

FIG. 1 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a structure of an orthogonalfrequency division multiplexing (OFDM) communication system to which anadaptive modulation and coding (AMC) scheme is applied. Referring toFIG. 1, a transmitting end 100 of the OFDM system comprises an encoder100, a channel interleaver 201, a mapper 103, an inverse fast Fouriertransform (IFFT) module 104, and a modulation and coding scheme (MCS)look-up table 105 for application of the AMC scheme.

More specifically, the encoder 101 can be configured to reduce theeffects of coding data bits and/or effects of noise. The channelinterleaver 102 can be configured to shuffle the coded bits so thatburst error of a channel can be distributed. In addition, the mapper 103can be configured to convert the bits outputted from the channelinterleaver 102 into symbols. Subsequently, the IFFT module 104 can beconfigured to modulate the symbols into OFDM symbols and sends them viachannel 300.

In addition, the transmitting end 100 can use the MCS look-up table 105,which is based on feedback information (e.g., MCS index) received from areceiving end 200. That is, the transmitting end 100 can select amodulation rate and a coding rate corresponding to the MCS index whichcorresponds to (or is provided in) the MCS look-up table 105. Theselected modulation rate and the coding rate can then be used foroperations of the encoder 101 and the mapper 103, respectively.

Referring to FIG. 1, the receiving end 200 of the OFDM communicationsystem comprises a fast Fourier transform (FFT) module 201, a demaper202, a channel de-interleaver 203, a decoder 204, and an AMC controller205. More specifically, the FFT module 201 can be configured to convertthe OFDM symbols, which were converted by the IFFT module 104, back tosymbols, and the de-mapper 202 can be configured to convert the symbolsinto bits. Thereafter, the de-interleaver 203 can be configured toarranges (or re-orders) the shuffled bits back to original arrangementor order. Moreover, the channel decoder 204 can be configured to outputthe processed (or estimated) data bits.

In addition, the AMC controller 205 can be configured to calculate asignal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the received signal(s) and include thisinformation in the feedback information, which is to be used for MCSindex, for example, and thereafter, transmitted to the transmitting end.

FIG. 2 is an exemplary diagram illustrating application of the AMCscheme in the OFDM system. Referring to FIG. 2, the AMC scheme canmeasure average SNRs for all subcarriers in the receiving end.Thereafter, a code rate (or coding rate) and/or modulation size foroptimizing transmission rate of the data can be determined and selected.Here, the selection can be guided or restricted by a prescribed level ofquality of service (QoS). Then, the MCS index corresponding to theselected coding rate and/or modulation size can be selected and only theMCS index can be transmitted to the transmitting end.

More specifically, the receiving end 200 uses the feedback informationor channel responses to calculate the average SNR of all the subcarriers(S201). Here, the SNR can be calculated according to a followingequation.

$\begin{matrix}{{S\; N\; R} = {\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N}\left( {{H_{2}}^{2}{E_{S}/\sigma_{n}^{2}}} \right)}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \right\rbrack\end{matrix}$

Referring to Equation 1, N denotes a total number of subcarriers, H_(n)denotes n^(th) subcarrier of the channel response, E_(S) denotes anaverage signal energy, and σ_(n) ² denotes noise energy.

In subsequent steps (S202 and S203), the measured SNR from S201 can beused to select (or determine) the MCS index, which represents theoptimized data rate, in view of a predetermined frame error rate (FER).More specifically, in S202, the measured SNR is compared with a SNRthreshold for each level of link curve table included in the MCS look-uptable 105. The MCS look-up table 105 includes the link curve table whichrepresents the SNR threshold that satisfies the predetermined FER level.The SNR threshold can be determined by using simulation resultsaccording to all modulation sizes and coding rates used by the OFDMsystem. There can be various types of MCS look-up table, and thefollowing tables represent an example of a MCS look-up table.

TABLE 1 Level Modulation Coding rate 1 QPSK 1/3 2 QPSK 1/2 3 QPSK 2/3 4QPSK 3/4 5 16QAM 1/3 6 16QAM 1/2 7 16QAM 2/3 8 16QAM 3/4 9 64QAM 1/3 1064QAM 1/2 11 64QAM 2/3 12 64QAM 3/4

TABLE 2 Level Modulation Coding rate 1 QPSK 1/3 2 QPSK  5/12 3 QPSK 1/24 QPSK 2/3 5 QPSK 3/4 6 QPSK 5/6 7 16QAM 1/3 8 16QAM  5/12 9 16QAM 1/210 16QAM 2/3 11 16QAM 3/4 12 16QAM 5/6 13 64QAM 1/3 14 64QAM  5/12 1564QAM 1/2 16 64QAM 2/3 17 64QAM 3/4 18 64QAM 5/6

As discussed, Tables 1 and 2 are examples of MCS look-up tables. Here,indication of a link curve table having SNR threshold corresponding toeach MCS index is not shown. In step S202, the link curve table of theMCS look-up table can be used to determine a maximum level SNR thresholdwhich satisfies the SNR measured in step S201.

Thereafter, in step S203, the measured SNR can be used in selection ofthe MCS index, which indicates a maximum SNR threshold from the linkcurve table, from the MCS look-up table. The MCS index can then betransmitted to the transmitting end 100 as feedback information.

After receiving the feedback information from the receiving end 200, thetransmitting end 100 can use the MCS index (also referred to as “MCSlevel index”) to determine the modulation rate and the coding rate to beused for data transmission. In other words, the MCS look-up table can beused to determine the modulation rate and the coding rate to be used fordata transmission. Generally, the determined modulation rate and thecoding rate are also applied uniformly to all the subcarriers.

As described, only the SNR is considered in determining the MCS indexand as such, other factors such as frequency selectivity of a channel isnot considered. It may be more effective and efficient to applydifferent/various coding rates according to a level (or a degree) offrequency selectivity of a channel.

FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 are exemplary graphs illustrating performancecomparisons according to modulation and coding scheme (MCS) in a channelenvironment having different frequency selectivity.

Referring to FIGS. 3 and 4, the performance results of the OFDM systemapplying two (2) MCS index (or MCS level index) having the same spectralefficiency are shown. Here, TU stands for “typical urban” and representsa channel environment having a relatively larger frequency selectivity.PEDA stands for “Pedestrian A” and represents a channel environmenthaving a relatively smaller frequency selectivity. For both, acomparatively slow moving speed of 3 km/h is assumed, and there are two(2) receiving antennas to achieve antenna diversity. Based on thesesettings and assumption(s), simulations were conducted, and the resultsare shown in these figures.

As shown in FIG. 3, the two (2) MCS indices have the same frequencyefficiency where a first is represented by a quadrature phase shiftkeying (QPSK) with ⅔ coding rate applied thereto, and a second isrepresented by a 16 quadrature amplitude modulation (16QAM) with ⅓coding rate applied thereto. In a channel environment where thefrequency selectivity is smaller (e.g., PEDA), the FER performance (orFER results) of a situation where low modulation rate and high codingrate (e.g., QPSK, ⅔ coding rate) were applied outperformed anothersituation where high modulation rate and low coding rate (16QAM, ⅓coding rate) were applied.

Alternatively, in a channel environment where the frequency selectivityis larger (e.g., TU), the FER performance (or FER results) of asituation where high modulation rate and low coding rate (e.g., 16QAM, ⅓coding rate) were applied outperformed another situation where lowmodulation rate and high coding rate (e.g., QPSK, ⅓ coding rate) wereapplied.

If the frequency selectivity is small, gain achieved from channel codingin the OFDM system is relatively small, and conversely, if the frequencyselectivity is large, gain achieved from channel coding in the OFDMsystem is relatively greater. More specifically, the performance (orresults) of channel coding depends on amount or level of compensation ofthe subcarriers experiencing deep fading from performing channel codingin the OFDM system. Here, frequency diversity gained from channel codingis directly proportional to the size of frequency selectivity. In otherwords, if the frequency selectivity is large, then the frequencydiversity gained from channel coding also increases. Consequently, it isadvantageous to apply strong channel coding (or low coding rate).Conversely, if the frequency diversity is small (e.g., small frequencyselectivity), it is more advantageous to transmit using high coding ratesince the gain that can be achieved from channel coding is relativelysmaller.

Referring to FIG. 4, the two (2) MCS indices have the same frequencyefficiency where a first is represented by QPSK with ⅚ coding rateapplied thereto, and a second is represented by 16QAM with 5/12 codingrate applied thereto. In the channel environment having high frequencyselectivity (e.g., TU), the FER performance (or FER results) is betterin a situation where a comparatively lower coding rate (e.g., 16QAM,5/12 coding rate) is applied than a situation where a comparativelylarger coding rate (e.g., QPSK, ⅚ coding rate) is applied. Furthermore,compared to FIG. 3, the performance is superior to that of FIG. 3 as aresult of the difference in the coding rate (e.g., QPSK, ⅚ coding rateversus 16QAM, 5/12 coding rate). With respect to FIG. 3, the performanceis nearly saturated because strong channel coding is applied. However, arelatively weaker channel coding is applied, and therefore, there isgreater difference in the frequency diversity gain can be achieved inFIG. 4 where relatively weaker channel coding is applied compared tothat of FIG. 3.

In FIGS. 3 and 4, the simulation results were based on two (2) receivingantennas. If the simulations were run on a single receiving antenna, thedifference would likely have been greater. Furthermore, if the channelenvironment was different (e.g., channel having higher frequencyselectivity or channel having lower frequency selectivity), theperformance difference would have been noticeably different.

As discussed, the performance of the system can vary according to thechannel environment, and therefore, it is important to considerdifferent and/or varying channel conditions. Without suchconsiderations, the use of a fixed MCS index and application of the AMCscheme thereto would likely result in less-than-optimum systemperformance.

FIG. 5 is an exemplary diagram illustrating selection of coding rateaccording to frequency selectivity. Referring to FIG. 5, the frequencyselectivity of the receiving channel can be measured (S501). Variousmethods can be used for measuring the frequency selectivity of thereceiving channel, and in this example, the frequency selectivity of thereceiving channel is measured using multi-path delay profile andcoherence bandwidth.

For example, if the multi-path delay is large, the coherence bandwidthis small. Moreover, if the multi-path delay is greater than a specifiedthreshold or if the coherence bandwidth is below a specified threshold,the frequency selectivity of the receiving channel can be determined tobe high (e.g., high frequency selectivity).

Further, in order to measure the frequency selectivity of the channel, acorrelator can be used to measure a level (or degree) of correlationbetween each subcarrier. The correlator can be used when it is difficultto measure the multi-path delay value or the coherence bandwidth value.At the same time, the correlator can be used to measure the level ordegree of correlation between each OFDM subcarrier and determine thefrequency selectivity of the channel. The following equation can be usedto measure the level or degree of correlation between the OFDMsubcarriers.

$\begin{matrix}{\sigma = {\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N - m}{h_{n}h_{n + m}^{*}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 2} \right\rbrack\end{matrix}$

Here, σ denotes the correlation value between each subcarriers, Ndenotes a total number of subcarriers, n and m denote subcarrier index,and h_(n) denotes channel response of nth subcarrier.

After calculating the correlation value by using an equation such as theone of Equation 2, the correlation value can be compared to a specifiedthreshold value. If the calculated correlation value is greater than (orequal to) the specified threshold value, the frequency selectivity ofthe channel can be determined to be high, and conversely, if thecalculated correlation value is smaller than the specified thresholdvalue, the frequency selectivity of the channel can be determined to below. Here, the channel response being used can be calculated using pilotsymbols and/or preamble which are transmitted simultaneously during datatransmission.

In another embodiment of the present invention, a degree of powercorrelation between each subcarrier channels can be used to measure thefrequency selectivity of the channel. Here, if the frequency selectivityof the receiving channel is large, the degree of correlation between thesubcarrier channels is correspondingly large. Using this principal, itis possible to estimate the degree (or amount) of power correlationbetween each subcarrier channels for the frequency selectivity. Thecorrelator can be estimated using the following equation.

$\begin{matrix}{{w_{1}\left( {\frac{{h_{m}}^{2} - {h_{1}}^{2}}{m - 1}} \right)} + {w_{2}\left( {\frac{{h_{m + 1}}^{2} - {h_{2}}^{2}}{m - 1}} \right)} + {w_{3}{\frac{{h_{m + 2}}^{2} - {h_{3}}^{2}}{m - 1}}} + \ldots + {W_{N - m + 1}{\frac{{h_{N}}^{2} - {h_{N + m + 1}}^{2}}{m - 1}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 3} \right\rbrack\end{matrix}$

Referring to Equation 3, the subscripts represent the subcarrier index,and the sum of W₁−W_(N−m+1) equals 1. Using this equation, thecorrelation value can be attained. If the attained correlation value isgreater than (or equal to) a specified threshold value, the frequencyselectivity of the channel is determined to be large. Conversely, if theattained correlation value is less than the specified threshold value,then the frequency selectivity of the channel is determined to be small.

Furthermore, as another embodiment of the present invention, a powerdistribution value between each subcarrier index can be used to measurethe frequency selectivity of the channel. If the frequency selectivityof the receiving channel is large, the power distribution of eachsubcarrier of the corresponding channel is also large and using thispower distribution, the frequency selectivity can be estimated ormeasured. The power distribution value of each subcarriers can bemeasured using the following equation.

$\begin{matrix}{E\left\lbrack {\left( {{h_{n}}^{2} - M} \right)^{2} = {\frac{\left( {{h_{1}}^{2} - M} \right)^{2}}{N} + \frac{\left( {{h_{2}}^{2} - M} \right)^{2}}{N} + \ldots + \frac{\left( {{h_{N}}^{2} - M} \right)^{2}}{N}}} \right.} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 4} \right\rbrack\end{matrix}$

Referring to Equation 4, M denotes the average value of the channelpower, N denotes the total number of subcarriers, and h_(n) denotes thechannel response of the n^(th) subcarrier.

As discussed, measuring of the frequency selectivity of the channel isnot limited to the discussions of above and can be applied orimplemented using other means and methods.

Referring to FIG. 5, after determining the frequency selectivity of thereceiving channel (S501), a determination is made as to whether thedegree (or level) of the frequency selectivity is greater than or equalto than a specified frequency selectivity threshold (T_(s)) (S502).Here, the specified frequency selectivity threshold (T_(s)) can bedetermined differently according to a method (or a scheme) for measuringthe frequency selectivity. In a case where the frequency selectivity ismeasured using a specified method (or scheme), the performancedifference between the MCS levels according to the frequency selectivityof the channel, as illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, may vary or bedifferent based on which modulation rate or coding rate is applied. Assuch, the specified frequency selectivity threshold (T_(s)) can bemodified according to each of different situations.

According to this embodiment, if the frequency selectivity of thechannel of S502 is determined to be greater than (or equal to) thepredetermined specified frequency selectivity threshold (T_(s)), a lowcoding rate can be selected (S503). The low coding rate is selected soas to apply the AMC scheme. Alternatively, if the frequency selectivityof the channel of S502 is determined to be less than the predeterminedspecified frequency selectivity threshold (T_(s)), a high coding ratecan be selected (S504). Here, the high coding rate is selected so as toapply the AMC scheme.

In S503 and S504, selecting of the low coding rate or the high codingrate relates to the predetermined MCS look-up table. That is, the codingrate and modulation rate having the same frequency efficiency from theMCS look-up table can be selected. Furthermore, the MCS index having alow coding rate and a high modulation rate or the MCS index having ahigh coding rate and a low modulation rate can be selected. However, thesystem may demand higher overall throughput over a good FER. In such ascase, instead of using the predetermined MCS index set, the MCS levelselection can be optimized so as to increase system throughput.

Hereafter, a more detailed description of the MCS index set, as itrelates to predetermining the set, will be discussed. As discussed, theMCS index set includes MCS indices that have the same frequencyefficiency within the MCS look-up table.

As described with respect to Table 1 and Table 2, the MCS look-up tablecan include the MCS level set having the same frequency efficiency. Forexample, the MCS level set 3 of Table 1 having index of QPSK, ⅔ codingrate has the same frequency efficiency as the MCS level set 5 of Table 1having index of 16QAM, ⅓ coding rate. Furthermore, the MCS level set 6of Table 1 having index of 16QAM, ½ coding rate has the same frequencyefficiency as the MCS level set 9 having index of 64QAM, ⅓ coding rate.

In a discussion of another embodiment to follow, the MCS set (or the MCSlevel set) can be referred to as the MCS index set. Here, from aplurality of MCS level indices, the MCS set represented by two (2) MCSlevel indices having acceptable coding rate can be selected. The two (2)MCS level indices have the same frequency efficiency based on the degree(or level) of frequency selectivity. Accordingly, the MCS index setdefined by Tables 1 and 2 can be expressed as follows, respectively.

TABLE 3 Level Modulation/Coding rate 1 QPSK 2/3 16QAM 1/3 2 16QAM 1/264QAM 1/3

TABLE 4 Level Modulation/Coding rate 1 QPSK 2/3 16QAM 1/3 2 QPSK 5/664QAM 5/12 3 16QAM 3/4 64QAM 1/2

FIG. 6 is an exemplary diagram illustrating processes associated withMCS index selection. More specifically, the processes are associatedwith selection of MCS index having the coding rate based on thefrequency selectivity within a prescribed MCS set. Here, the prescribedMCS set includes the MCS indices, based on the SNR of the receivingsignal, that have the same frequency efficiencies.

Referring to FIG. 6, the AMC controller of the receiving end can beconfigured to measure the SNR of the receiving signal (S601). Themeasured SNR can be compared to each SNR threshold values of the MCSlook-up table (S602). Based on the comparison, the MCS level index canbe determined when the AMC scheme is used (S603).

Thereafter, a determination can be made as to whether the determined MCSlevel index includes a predetermined MCS index set (S604). If thepredetermined MCS index set is included in the MCS level index, a MCSset can be selected based on frequency selectivity of the receivingchannel (S606). For example, if the existing MCS look-up table is thesame as that of Table 1 and the determined MCS level index from S603 is3 (QPSK, ⅔ coding rate), since this is within the range of thepredetermined MCS index set, MCS index can be selected according to thefrequency selectivity with respect to the predetermined MCS index set.In S606, the frequency selectivity of the receiving channel can bemeasured.

However, if the predetermined MCS index set is not included in the MCSlevel index, the MCS index determined in S603 can be maintained (S605),and if necessary, the determined MCS index can be transmitted to thetransmitting end.

As discussed, the frequency selectivity of the receiving channel can bemeasured in S606. As a method of measuring frequency selectivity of thereceiving channel, any one or more of following factors or elements canbe used. The factors or elements include a multi-path delay profileaccording to receiving channel condition, coherence bandwidth, degree(or level) of correlation between each set of subcarriers of thereceiving channel, power correlation, and power distribution value.However, the method of measuring frequency selectivity of the receivingchannel is not limited to using the aforementioned factors or elementsbut can use other factors or elements.

In the subsequent step, a comparison is made to determine whether thefrequency selectivity of the receiving channel measured in S606 isgreater than (or equal to) a specified frequency selectivity threshold(S607). If the measured frequency selectivity of the receiving channelis greater than (or equal to) the specified frequency selectivitythreshold (T_(s)), the MCS index having a low coding rate from the MCSindex set can be selected (S608). Conversely, if the measured frequencyselectivity of the receiving channel is smaller than the specifiedfrequency selectivity threshold (T_(s)), the MCS index having a highcoding rate from the MCS index set can be selected (S609).

For example, assume that Table 1 is used as the MCS look-up table, Table3 is used as the MCS index set, and MCS level index 3 (QPSK, ⅔ codingrate) is selected. Here, if the frequency selectivity of thecorresponding receiving channel is determined to be high, the MCS sethaving a low coding rate (16QAM, ⅓ coding rate) from the MCS index setof Table 3 with the same frequency efficiency is selected. If necessary,a corresponding MCS index (level 5) can be transmitted to thetransmitting end. Further with the example, if level index (16QAM, ⅓coding rate) is selected and the frequency selectivity of thecorresponding receiving channel is determined to be high, this meansthat the MCS index, from the MCS index set, having low coding rate isselected, and hence, the determined MCS index can be maintained.

The discussion of above assumes that both the transmitting end and thereceiving end has information related to the MCS index set, and at thesame time, assumes that both the transmitting end and the receiving endhave the specified MCS index set stored.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the receiving endcan send to the transmitting end an unmodified MCS index based on SNRmeasurement of the receiving signal, or the receiving end can sent amodified MCS index in view of the frequency selectivity of the receivingchannel. After receiving the MCS index from the receiving end, thetransmitting end can determine the coding rate and the modulation ratein the encoder 101 and the mapper 103 of FIG. 1.

Preferably, the MCS index can be selected at the receiving end foracquiring necessary information. However, if the processes associatedwith MCS index selection, in addition to other processes and operations,take place at the receiving end, this can cause complexity problems forthe receiving end.

In order to alleviate problems that can arise from receiving endperforming the MCS index selection, for example, the transmitting end(e.g., base station or Node B) can be assigned to perform a part of theprocesses associated with the MCS index selection. More specifically,the process of measuring the frequency selectivity of the receivingchannel can be performed at the receiving end, and information regardingthe measured frequency selectivity is then sent to the transmitting end.With this information, the transmitting end can select the MCS indexaccording to the received information which includes the frequencyselectivity of the receiving channel. Here, with respect to FIG. 6, theinformation can further include not only the frequency selectivity ofthe receiving channel but also the SNR of the receiving signal.

Such a process can be used in a closed-loop system in which theinformation regarding the frequency selectivity of the receiving channelis fed back to the transmitting end. In the transmitting end, the MCSindex selection module can operate using the information, including theMCS level and the frequency selectivity of the receiving channel,received from the receiving end. Here, the MCS selection processes canbe the same as the processes described above with respect to embodimentsof the present invention.

Because the information regarding the frequency selectivity of thereceiving channel has to be fed back (or transmitted) to thetransmitting end, there can be overload or excessive transmission offeedback information (which can also be referred to as feedbacksignaling overhead). As such, if the system deems the overload of thefeedback information to be more important than the complexity problem ofthe receiving end, then it may be preferable to use the MCS indexselection module of the transmitting end. However, if the system deemsthe overload of the feedback information to be less important than thecomplexity problem of the receiving end, then it may be preferable touse the MCS index selection module of the receiving end.

By using the principal where higher performance is achieved by applyingweak channel coding (or high coding rate) in the PEDA environment, andby applying strong channel coding (or low coding rate) in the TUenvironment, an optimum performance can be achieved. Here, the MCS tableis also used according to the frequency selectivity of the receivingchannel.

In other words, a MCS table can apply the MCS level to which a lowcoding rate is applied (hereafter referred to as “1^(st) MCS table”).Another MCS table can apply the MCS level to which a high coding rate isapplied (hereafter referred to as “2^(nd) MCS table”). With respect tothe modulation rate, the 1^(st) MCS table can be configured with highmodulation rate, and the 2^(nd) MCS table can be configured with lowmodulation rate.

The MCS index selection scheme can be applied in multiple antennasystems, such as a multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) system. Assumingthat each of the embodiments as discussed belongs to the MIMO system,the frequency selectivity can be measured per channel according to eachof the multiple antennas in steps S501 of FIG. 5 and S606 of FIG. 6.After frequency selectivity is measured per channel for each antenna,the MCS index can be re-selected for the channel having high frequencyselectivity so that the particular channel can be assigned low codingrate. Conversely, if the channel has low frequency selectivity, then theMCS can be re-selected so that the particular channel can be assignedhigh coding rate. With such processes, the MIMO system can be optimized.

Here, the amount of calculations or measurements by the frequencyselectivity measurement module and/or the MCS re-selection module canincrease based on the number of transmit/receiving antennas. As such,the amount of calculations/measurement can be compared with performanceenhancement in making the correct or appropriate selection.

If the MCS index selection scheme is applied in the MIMO system, the MCSlevel, having considered the frequency selectivity of the receivingchannel per transmit antenna, can be applied for transmission. Withmultiple transmit antennas, diversity effect or gain can be optimized.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, the MCS indexselection scheme can be applied to a situation where a single MCS index,including information regarding average of all orthogonal frequencydivision multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers, is fed back to thetransmitting end. Here, the situations can further include selecting MCSindices associated with each subcarrier or a group of subcarriers. Inthe frequency selectivity measurement steps, such as S501 of FIG. 5 andS606 of FIG. 6, the frequency selectivity can be measured per subcarrieror per a group of subcarriers. Here, the group of subcarriers includesat least two subcarriers per group. Furthermore, the frequency MCS indexselection steps of FIGS. 5 and 6 can also select the MCS index for eachsubcarrier or for a group of subcarriers.

Here, the amount of information of the MCS indices can increase sinceMCS index is applied to each subcarrier or a group of subcarriers. Inview of this, the increase in amount of information can be compared fromthe perspective of performance enhancement of the system in making thecorrect or appropriate selection.

FIG. 7 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a structure of an apparatusfor selecting MCS index. Referring to FIG. 7, the apparatus includes afrequency selectivity measurement module 701 and a MCS index selectionmodule 702.

More specifically, the frequency selectivity measurement module 701 canbe configured to use various methods in measuring the frequencyselectivity (e.g., methods associated with multi-path delay profilebased on receiving channel condition, coherent bandwidth, degree ofcorrelation between each subcarrier of the receiving channel, powercorrelator, and power distribution value). FIG. 7, as illustrated here,is based on the multi-path delay profile.

As such, the frequency selectivity measurement module 701 furtherincludes a multi-path delay profile measurement unit 701 a configured tomeasure the multi-path delay profile of the receiving channel signal,and a comparison unit 701 b configured to determine whether frequencyselectivity of the receiving channel is high or low by comparing themeasured multi-path delay profile against the predetermined thresholdvalue.

After the frequency selectivity measurement module 701 determines thedegree or level of the frequency selectivity of the receiving channel,the MCS index selection module 702 selects a MCS index having a lowcoding rate if the frequency selectivity of the receiving channel ishigh, and conversely, the MCS index selection module 702 selects a MCSindex having a high coding rate if the frequency selectivity of thereceiving channel is low.

As discussed, the MCS index selection scheme (or method) can be appliedto situations where only the coding rate is considered, where MCS indexset is used as shown in Tables 3 and 4, and where the MCS table havinghigh coding rate and the MCS table having low coding rate areindependently configured.

The frequency selectivity measurement module 701 and the MCS indexselection module 702 can be located in the receiving end. However, inview of excess processes and/or operations that may be performed by thereceiving end, the frequency selectivity measurement module 701 can belocated in the receiving end and the MCS index selection module 702 canbe located in the transmitting end so as to alleviate (or reduce) excessprocesses. To this end, the receiving end (e.g., mobile terminal) needsto send feedback information, including information regarding themeasured frequency selectivity, to the transmitting end.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that variousmodifications and variations can be made in the present inventionwithout departing from the spirit or scope of the inventions. Thus, itis intended that the present invention covers the modifications andvariations of this invention provided they come within the scope of theappended claims and their equivalents.

1-20. (canceled)
 21. A method of determining a Modulation and CodingScheme (MCS) at a receiving party in a mobile communication system, themethod comprising: receiving, from a transmitting party, an indexindicating a specific MCS level in a predetermined MCS lookup tablepredetermined between the receiving party and the transmitting party;and determining, at the receiving party, the MCS applied to a signaltransmission of the transmitting party according to the received index,wherein the MCS lookup table comprises two or more of MCS sets havingthe same frequency efficiency, and wherein the two or more of MCS setshaving the same frequency efficiency comprises two or more MCS levelshaving the same frequency efficiency, but having different modulationorder from each other.
 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the two ormore of MCS sets having the same frequency efficiency comprises two ormore MCS levels having the same frequency efficiency, but havingdifferent coding rate from each other.
 23. The method of claim 21,wherein the index is selected based on a frequency efficiency determinedusing a channel quality measurement value, and wherein the MCS isdetermined among the MCS sets having the same frequency efficiencyconsidering a frequency selectivity.
 24. The method of claim 21, whereinthe receiving party receives signal from the transmitting party using aMulti-Input Multi-Output (MIMO) scheme, and wherein the receiving partyreceives indices indicating predetermined MCS levels in the MCS lookuptable for each of transmission antennas, respectively.
 25. The method ofclaim 21, wherein the receiving party is a User Equipment (UE) and thetransmitting party is eNode B.
 26. A method of transmitting an indexindicating Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) level at a transmittingparty in a mobile communication system, the method comprising:receiving, from a receiving party, a feedback signal indicating achannel quality measurement value; selecting and transmitting an indexindicating a specific MCS level in a predetermined MCS lookup tablepredetermined between the transmitting party and the receiving party,wherein the MCS lookup table comprises two or more of MCS sets havingthe same frequency efficiency, and wherein the two or more of MCS setshaving the same frequency efficiency comprises two or more MCS levelshaving the same frequency efficiency, but having different modulationorder from each other.
 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the two ormore of MCS sets having the same frequency efficiency comprises two ormore MCS levels having the same frequency efficiency, but havingdifferent coding rate from each other.
 28. The method of claim 26,wherein the index is selected based on a frequency efficiency determinedusing the channel quality measurement value, and wherein the MCS isdetermined among the MCS sets having the same frequency efficiencyconsidering a frequency selectivity.
 29. The method of claim 26, whereinthe transmitting party transmits signal to the receiving party using aMulti-Input Multi-Output (MIMO) scheme, and wherein the transmittingparty transmits indices indicating predetermined MCS levels in the MCSlookup table for each of transmission antennas, respectively.
 30. Themethod of claim 26, wherein the receiving party is a User Equipment (UE)and the transmitting party is eNode B.